Sunday, May 19, 2013


News

Powers Agree Plan For Syrian Transitional Government

UN-Arab League peace envoy Kofi Annan opened the meeting in Geneva.
UN-Arab League peace envoy Kofi Annan opened the meeting in Geneva.

Related Articles

Syria: A War Reported By Citizen-Journalists, Social Media

Public protests against the government of President Bashar al-Assad have put Syria’s emerging civil war front page and at the top of the news around the world.
TEXT SIZE - +
By RFE/RL
World powers and neighbors of Syria have agreed on a road map for political transition to end 16 months of bloodshed but left open the question of whether President Bashar al-Assad can take part.  

However, after talks in Geneva, international envoy Kofi Annan said he doubted Syrians would pick individuals with "blood on their hands."  

"I think people with blood on their hands hopefully are not the only people in Syria," Annan said. "I think the government will have to be formed through discussion, negotiations, and by mutual consent. And I will doubt that the Syrians -- who have fought so hard for their independence, to be able to have a say how they are governed and who governs them -- will select people with blood on their hands to lead them."

Under the UN plan, the transitional government would oversee the drafting of a new constitution and elections.

Annan warned failure to resolve the crisis in Syria could ignite the region and turn into an international crisis.  

"We are determined to work together urgently and intensively to bring about an end to the violence and human rights abuses and the launch of a Syrian-led political process leading to a transition that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people and enables them independently and democratically to determine their own future," Annan told reporters.

Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Assad's "days are numbered."  

"In deciding to accept minor textual changes, we and our partners made absolutely clear to Russia and China that it is now incumbent upon them to show Assad the writing on the wall," Clinton said. "I do not believe that anyone in the Assad regime ever thought we could come out with a unified statement today expressing not only the concerns but a path forward that would include Russia and China, and he needs to hear loudly and clearly that his days are numbered."

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, however, said it was up to the Syrians, not the United Nations, to decide who will govern the country.  

"In the original version, there was a phrase to the effect that people should be excluded who are standing in the way of peace or preventing peace," Lavrov said. "That is not consistent with the principal inclusiveness of the political process in Syria. it is not consistent with the provisions of the UN charter on noninterference in internal affairs of sovereign states, and it is not consistent with the logic of the document adopted today, which says that the fate of the country should be decided by Syrians themselves."

Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi called for all sides to end the violence "without attaching any conditions."   

Rami Abdul-Rahman, director of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, said the Syrian opposition would not take part in any transitional government "while Assad is still in power."

British Foreign Secretary William Hague noted that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told diplomats that a UN monitoring mission in Syria would have to be pulled back if no diplomatic solution was found.

Meanwhile, inside Syria, the violence continues.

Opposition activists said Syrian forces killed more than 30 people on June 30 in Damascus when they fired a mortar bomb into a funeral procession for a man who had died in shelling the day before.

The United Nations says violence in the country has worsened since a cease-fire deal in April.

With reporting by AP, AFP, and Reuters
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Joe Zrnchik from: US
June 30, 2012 11:14
This post is from someone who has served as an intelligence officer in the US military. The US's Plan B has always been to create chaos. Unless the US admits it has imported and supported al Qaeda terrorists who have committed mass atrocities against the Syrian people and then blamed it on Assad, I really don't see what the use of the conference is except as a means of conspiring by the West. The US government practically demanded the Syrian government just surrender to foreign Sunni jihadists and other radical militants that would rather wage war against Shiites than defend Palestinians from Israeli slaughter. These same fighters slaughter civilians which the Zionist media blamed on Assads forces. When the Sunnis faced the Israeli military they turn and ran while Hezbollah stands and defends the people from Israeli slaughter. As far as Hezbollah being a terrorist organization, this is nonsense. Iit has no offensive capability but is merely a defensive militia. The US and Israelis are mad because Hezbollah can successfully defend against IDF slaughter of civilians in Lebenon. This whole Syria fiasco is about Turkey instigating a proxy war between the US and Iran and Russia. Syrians do not want their country destroyed and polluted for the next 1000 years with tons of depleted uranium causing birth defects and cancer. The domestic forces want to negotiate, but the imported Sunni radical militants do not care if the country is destroyed and the Syrian people poisoned. The Syrian people want these al Qaeda elements out of their country. The US can not control them now and have created a quagmire for the majority of Syrians who want peace. This introduction of al Qaeda and radical Sunnis is another classic case of CIA blowback. It will be up to the Free Syrian Army to kill these al Qaeda elements. I find it highly offensive that my government is supporting the same group who brought down the Twin Tower. By the way, all the 9/11 attackers were Sunni and from Saudi Arabia, so why did we attack Saddam when he was the mortal enemy of both al Qaeda and bin Laden. The US needs to attack Saudi Arabia not Shiite countries. If Bush was not in bed with the Saudis he would have attacked them instead of committing treason against the American people and initiating a war for oil, bases and Israeli interests against Saddam. As all the experts told him at the time, all the Iraq war would do is expand Iranian influence by creating a Shiite government in Iraq. Now it leaves us trying to bring back balance by creating a Sunni regime in Syria. Maybe we need to stop meddling before Hillary starts WWIII.

by: Jack from: US
June 30, 2012 14:00
US and Saudi governments are staunch supporters of peaceful Wahhabi Sunni activists killing Christians and Shia muslims. US is the major sponsor of terrorism.
In Response

by: Jack from: US
June 30, 2012 18:15
This was not posted by me but by an RFE/RL staffer. But I do agree with the substance of the post, especially the part about Wahhabis killing Christians, this being the sad and continuing tragedy in the history of my native Serbia.
In Response

by: rick
June 30, 2012 19:13
http://gdb.rferl.org/DC1350FF-E5FA-4236-846C-167B322329A6_w640_r1_s.jpg
In Response

by: William from: Aragon
July 01, 2012 00:02
Hello Jack, I am not sure that it was an RFE/RL staffer and more likely one of the trolls that visits this site, but you have finally found a staunch ally on many of the issues that you have raised in the past.

Most Popular